top of page

Peer Review Policy

All submitted manuscripts undergo a peer-review process to ensure scientific quality and academic rigor.

Review Process

  1. Manuscripts are initially screened by the Editorial Office for scope, quality, and compliance with submission requirements.

  2. Suitable manuscripts are sent for review by qualified subject experts.

  3. Reviewers evaluate manuscripts for originality, methodology, scientific validity, clarity, ethical compliance, and significance.

  4. Editorial decisions may be:

    • Accept

    • Accept with Minor Revisions

    • Revise and Resubmit

    • Reject

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers shall:

  1. Maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.

  2. Provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations.

  3. Identify relevant published work not cited by authors.

Disclose any conflicts of interest and decline review when necessary.

bottom of page